![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
Well, if were were to accept this last diagram as fact Arjuna i suppose that your blade would best be described as Cundrik Pandawa since it is both wavy and has no separate gonjo as the other two example do.
Though i am still suspicious of this blade in regards to my question i first made about it. This appears to a a blade that was has been reformed. The front edge near the base looks like it has been sheared off, leaving a flat surface. Can we see some sharper photos of this area of the blade? Can we see the way it fits into the sheath from an above view. Should we expect a Javanese blade form purported to possibly be from a royal family to carry a Madurese hilt form? I suspect this could possibly be a composite piece. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Vienna
Posts: 17
|
![]() Quote:
Regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
Another old cengkrong or cundrik blade with 5 luk and rather similar to Arjuna's specimen.
Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 417
|
![]()
I have an almost similar blade, but the hilt and scabbard are recent.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
So no one wants to address my question about the squared-off nature of the "gandik" area of this blade?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|