![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Wayne,
Quote:
![]() Your's is not a parang niabor though. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
Langgai Tinggang then?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]() Quote:
http://old.blades.free.fr/swords/day...ayak_intro.htm Ben |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
yup, that's where i got the name from....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Wayne,
Quote:
Assuming that your blade's cross-section isn't convex/concave, it possibly is supposed to represent a langgai tinggang... Regards, Kai Last edited by kai; 26th February 2018 at 08:49 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]() Quote:
Not correct the langgai tinggai Has an very different krowit. It is an cross we see this a lot with the newer type s Ben |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Sure, it's non-traditional as already stipulated. I agree that the krowit is off by a far margin.
Arguably it isn't very sensible trying to tag any name on a mix of styles... Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|