![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,306
|
All of your observations seem valid to me, Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,378
|
I think it's a married piece.
The pattern does appear to me to be etched; the blade is too thin where it joins the handle. Workmanship on the blade is too crude or hurried in execution as Bob has mentioned. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,306
|
That would certainly explain the misalignment; I previously hadn't thought that it had been chemically etched because it was fairly deep and it had a strange pattern.Thank you for your insights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,913
|
My estimate is 19th century fake wootz blade. Definitely not Mughal.
Happy new year! Marius |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,306
|
Do you think it is Persian as well and do you believe it to be as old as 19th century or more modern? Thanks
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|