![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
The blade has apparently no pamor pattern(?) and it does not clearly look Bugis to me (but Bugis influenced). I never saw a similar blade identified as Sumatran but who knows?
Best regards
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,250
|
hmmm...i would have placed it on the Peninsula.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
Gavin, does the "differential heat treatment" produce dark edges and a lighter coloured blade centre, or a dark front section of the blade, with a lighter coloured base?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,376
|
After looking at it off and on today, I get a peninsular feel from it also.
I'm not sure myself when what seems to be a forging flaw (if my eyes don't deceive me) becomes pamor. If that's the original patina you've got to wonder if a stain would be out of place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Quote:
It is the later, dark front section, lighter base. Gavin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: 40˚00' N, 83˚00' W
Posts: 52
|
To me, the non-contrasting pamor and fullered blade would indicate a peninsular origin. To hedge one's bets, one could easily add "Bugis-influenced" to that statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
Thanks Gavin.
Yeah, that is the normal thing we see, it is just due to where the immersion into the quench stopped, front hard, back soft. I asked the question, because sometimes the edges of the blade will show dark and the central area greyish, which indicates pamor of some sort or another , usually just pamor sanak. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Quote:
Gavin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
David, Rick,
My initial thoughts when it arrived were north east coast peninsular, but I soon forgot the features of the Gandik and was lost in the broad bevelled edges and followed another path and have been lost in Sumatra. Given the almost mono-steel appearance and the nature of the heat treatment, these points are typical of Patani through to Terengganu. As you suspect, it is likely better placed in Malaysia. Gavin |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,376
|
Quote:
Iirc this was collected in Makassar, 1920's. Last edited by Rick; 16th June 2017 at 06:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,818
|
Quote:
Have you ever seen a similar blade with these features? I have not treated the blade in any way buy there could be something subtle in the blade when I give consideration to its typical layered gonjo. Under a bright light there holds some potential throughout the blades surfaces, but nothing in the traditional pamor sense, but certainly a clear differential heat treatment that I cannot capture with the camera... With regards to pamor and this blade; the single open line running the length of one face only (the image presented) can be considered a pamor. With reference to Newbold's work and other keris I have seen and own, this occurrence could be considered as pamor tiga alif, an occurrence which I doubt is random as I do not believe random was ever the desire in any keris forging. I've another very large old sepakol blade with a rather mono-steel looking blade but three perfectly spaced and placed openings in one face only, (the same face as this keris I present above) and in the same open manner, albiet more precise in the other keris...it is Alif pamor. Gavin |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|