![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
Just read through some of the posts more carefully and I thought I should say some more things:
To Nechesh -- sorry for not answering your question when you asked. I was starting to question my own understanding of the pudak setegal at that point in time, so I did not want to say anything potentially wrong. To Empu Kumis -- the gang (Paul, Dave, Adni and myself) here in Singapore looks forward to seeing you again, and I'm sure we have many things to discuss over coffee or dinner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 940
|
No Problem Blu.
It wasn't omly directed at you. There were a few others who could have answered as well. So i guess what i currently understand after E.K.s explanation is that it is NOT necessary for this feature to pertrude from the blade profile. I guess i had assumed this was necessary because in all the diagrams that DO show this feature it always does stick out.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|