![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,194
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you Victrix!! Indeed that was my impression, and good work in removing the hilt, which of course was as indicated, not original to this blade. These marks often on the tang are often not seen as few wish to dismantle the weapon and compromise its integrity as homogenous with that aspect. When you mentioned squirrel, my first thoughts were the Eickhorns of course, but this animal does not seem to have the plumed tail (it may be gone from the cartouche). The book by Staffan Kinman is by the way, an outstanding reference which compiles data from the other well known compendiums very comprehensively. Still there some other sources, need to look further. There is no doubt this is an 18th century blade, and as noted, a distinctive 'pandour' style point with the 'magic' decorative motif of the time. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 5
|
![]()
thanks for guiding me in a direction. any ideas on how to clean up the blade to see the mark better?
i compared the swords mark with eickorn squirrel and looks similiar but different. still researching and will post a better picture soon but carl eickorn seems very far from late 18 century? i have not found pictures of Friedrich Eickhorn (1650-1680) either one seems of the mark time wise. very interesting will look some more |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 5
|
![]()
Here is what i see as a squirell, i could be wrong.
Internet research does not find the same pattern. Any ideas on how i can clean up the rust on the sword? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 755
|
![]() Quote:
The Eickhorn symbols in my book are similar not identical and they changed at times. Also there may have been more generations Eickhorn in the business who are not mentioned there. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|