![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Surabaya - Indonesia
Posts: 199
|
![]() Quote:
oddly it is the invasion of Pamekasan who got more recognition here's a translation for you all in the beginning of islamic kingdoms era, Madura is a region, ruled by semi-independent kingdoms under Demak. Such example is Pamekasan, which ruled by Ronggosukowati. During his reign Pamekasan faced invasion by Balinese kingdom. The reason behind the Invasion was because Madura helped Demak attacked Hindu Blambangan kingdom, of which Balinese proclaim as their ancestor. This invasion is kinda weird, because it was much easier for Bali to invade Java (Demak) rather than set sail to invade Madura, which is considerably farther one theory is Balinese thought that Madura is an important hub spot, which must be conquered before attacking other areas in Java coastline. According to A. Sulaiman Sadik, Balinese warriors also attacking other areas in Madura. In Pamekasan, they punctured deep into enemy territory by using riverways. They tied (Acangcang in Madurese) their boats (jung in Madurese) in the estuary area is now known as Jhungcangcang village (village of tied boats). story goes on that Balinese army were met by Pamekasan army and Balinese army were defeated. Survivors asked for pardon and were allowed to live on the surrounding area. Until now, there are still descendants of Balinese warriors who lived in Jhungcancang village area. Similar defeat also happened in Sumenep area, also known as Ghirpapas war Donny |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,991
|
![]()
Thanks for filling that in Donny.
I was given it by a relative who was living in Sumenep in the 1980's, he took me out to a place near the port and showed me a place where he reckoned they landed. Its a good story, some of it might even be true. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
A similar blade and a similar scabbard as those shown by Athanase.
Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 417
|
![]()
Thank you all for your valuable information.
![]() I have a little question : With the bondolan hilt, I keep the Javanese mendak or not? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
No, with a bondolan hilt you should better fit a Balinese uwer (ring) IMO.
Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
Athanase, the bondalan style hilt that you should be looking for is not the typical Balinese style. The Maduran form is a bit wide, sqautter, stockier if you will. This style is discussed a little bit on this thread as well as what may or may not be an appropriate mendak for such a hilt.
http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...light=bondalan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 417
|
![]()
Ok, thank you very much.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]() Quote:
A bondolan hilt does not need an uwer. Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,991
|
![]()
Yes, you're right Kai:- a bondolan does not need a transition piece from blade to hilt.
However, the complete keris usually is much more pleasing if a "keris ring" is fitted. It's a matter of proportion and perception. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
Anyway the existing mendak is a Central Java model and should better be replaced.
Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Thanks, Alan!
Since the proportions between hilt and gambar (as well as gandar) are already different, would you go for a uwer Bali (maybe a relatively narrow one?) or a Madura style mendak or even selut? Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|