![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 584
|
![]()
Most interesting hypothesise which I would go along with as it ticks the boxes. The peacock was also a symbol in Persia. Well done Holmes.
Miguel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,189
|
![]()
I agree with Miguel.
Berkeley, a most compelling theory, and nice research to bring in the Persian rug making angle! I would never have thought of this as such an implement, but this makes perfect sense. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
For that, the inner edges of the forked blade should have been razor-sharp. On the object they look dull and horribly uneven.
And didn't Iranian carpet makers have just scissors? I am glad that Jum agrees with me about its age. We all have "walls of shame" in our collections. Why would Met be an exception? Iranian carpet traders can spin provenance stories more fabulous than Chinese E-Bayers:-) My hypothesis is more pedestrian, but the Occam Razor still cuts quite well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|