![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,231
|
![]() Quote:
Roland asks "Artificially aged for what?" In my experience current era blades receive artificial aging treatment for at least two reasons. Firstly AFAIK it is the current fashion in Jawa for even acknowledged new blades to receive an aging treatment. People seem to like the look. Personal i agree with you that when i have an acknowledged current era blade i would rather have one that is not eroded in any way, but i am a collector from outside the culture and i can't really argue with how the people who are the legitimate owners of keris culture choose to present and maintain their keris. Secondly a keris can be aged to deceive. You say "the value of such a corroded blade is lower than a smooth blade with good visible pamor", but that is only true if we are comparing keris that we accept as being equal in actual age. The rarity of certain dhapurs in truly antique blades can overcome condition in terms of value. I do not believe i have ever seen this particular dhapur in a confirmed antique blade so if we accept this one as being an actual antique the value is risen above a current era example that might be in perfect and un-eroded condition, no? ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
![]() Quote:
your words makes sense to me. Master Maiseys comment allows interpretations in different directions. I believe, collectors as you, Alan or Detlef easily see the inconsistency compared to old blades. For a beginner like me the blade is too corroded. I think your statement about the local preferences is very conclusive. Roland |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,348
|
![]()
I can testify to the artificial ageing of new blades.
It took my contact a few years to find me a new keris buda that hadn't been artificially aged. That is how prevalent this artificial ageing is... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,283
|
![]()
I am nearly sure that we see here a reworked old blade, the singa is added newly, that's the reason that the greneng is worn like this but the contours of the singa are so sharp and the penis still so large. Also the typical Sineba bulge seems not correct to my eyes, the form is not typical IMVHO. But frankly said I've handled only very few Sineba blades so it's just my impression.
Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,231
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,283
|
![]() Quote:
that's the reason why I have asked in my first post to this thread for an unoiled and maybe fresh stained blade. ![]() Regards, Detlef |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
|
![]()
It is hard to determine much from the photos but on Donny's 3rd image (side on, greneng to the left) I wonder whether I might be seeing a weld line from above the Singo's head to a point just in front of the pesi
DrD |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|