![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
thanks for the compliments but I must disappoint you, I am for the time being still a student in arms.
![]() The hilt is a combination of norman type 74 and 77. The globular pommel characterizes Dutch rapiers. The grid pattern was found on several arms and armour around 1570-1580, see for example the pommels and round finals of different dussages. best, jasper Last edited by cornelistromp; 14th February 2017 at 10:32 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,191
|
![]() Quote:
Very well put Fernando! Jasper, my opinion stands, and thank you for the insight into this pattern. Grid is exactly the term I was looking for and I see what you mean on its occurrence on dusagges and now recall seeing that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Globular or spherical pommels per se weren't restricted to the Netherlands. Note a north Italian example, inv. no. 1776, Museo Poldi Pezzoli (Milano), publ. Boccia/Coelho 1975, #485. The swept hilt is cataloged as 1580-90, from Belluno; earlier riding-swords and backswords from this area which are practically identical to Styrian counterparts also share this feature (Coll. Luigi Marzoli, Brescia, inv. no. G 21 and G 23). A faceted version of the sphere can be seen on a somewhat simpler swept hilt on a rapier identified by Capwell as possibly Italian, 1570-80, Wallace Collection inv. no. A576, publ. Norman 1986, p 134.
Grid filework is also seen on a few Italian rapier hilts, q.v. inv. no. 2575, Museo Poldi Pezzoli, with an example depicted in art, "Portrait of a Gentleman" by Bartolomeo Passarotti 1571, Museo Bardini (Firenze), both publ Boccia/Coelho 1975, # 465, 466-67. It must be said, however, that these Italian examples are a bit more elegantly proportioned than the hilt on the sword discussed here. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,191
|
![]()
Anybody out there have any thoughts or ideas on the rather crudely incised lettering and unusual spelling in the FRAN'Z'ISCO RUIZ ??? the curious 'crescent' (?) at the forte? The absence of the Ruiz punzone?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
There is no punzon, as there is no FranZisco Ruiz. How many spurious spellings of great Masters like Ayala, for one, do you know, Jim ?
You are left to crack the riddle of the crescent presence ![]() ![]() . Last edited by fernando; 16th February 2017 at 07:47 PM. Reason: spell |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,191
|
![]()
OK Fernando, that was the point, it is a spurious use of the name, so obviously the punzone (or is it punSone?
![]() With the erratic letters in the inscription which are almost crudely executed I fear this is even beyond the usual Solingen placement, and with the number of rapier examples that have been in circulation using the Francisco Ruiz name (a number are less than authentic) I wonder on this. Could it be a Solingen blade with poorly applied letters but of the period by a maker without the usual rack system? The apparent crescent is a conundrum in itself, is this an equally inept attempt at the 'espadero del rey' mark? I do not like negatively questioning a weapon, which is otherwise a most attractive and interesting piece, but these factors must be considered. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|