![]()  | 
	
| 
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Apr 2015 
				Location: Malaysia 
				
				
					Posts: 325
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Ron; Thanks for the link. 
		
		
		
			F de Luzon; Good idea about wraping up with cloth on the top part of the scabbard where the rattan bainding is now missing. But I believe the scabbard has the rattan all the way up to the cross piece originally. I have people here that do rattan works (for chairs and such) who can easily put new rattan binding at this missing part - although I'm very sure they can not replicate the original exactly. The original looks v brittle now and was protected by previous owner with transparent tape which is peeling off now. I'm not sure if I should do this (new rattan binding for missing part) or just use cloth binding which is a lot easier or leave the thing as it is. **** I recieved the kris last week (see pics with purplish mat background). The cross piece decoration is very similar to some barongs. I did a little bit of amateurish cleaning with vineger (see pics with red background) . The blade showed 'pamor' and laminated(?). Is this usual for Kris? the okir look quite nice to me.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2016 
				
				
				
					Posts: 184
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Hi Green, Be very careful when drawing the kris from the scabbard if the binding is brittle. I've heard of several accidents when this type of scabbard splits. F. de Luzon  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 Keris forum moderator 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Aug 2006 
				Location: Nova Scotia 
				
				
					Posts: 7,250
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			That cleaned up nicely Green. What your post-cleaned kris shows is indeed lamination, not pamor. Have you determined if the fittings are aluminum or some other kind of white metal. They look less like aluminum in the after cleaned photos. If they are not aluminum i'd say it is more likely the kris is a little older than i first thought, perhaps around WWII era. Shame about the missing MOP. It would be nice to replace them, but it would be difficult to match the designed pieces properly.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Apr 2015 
				Location: Malaysia 
				
				
					Posts: 325
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks David; 
		
		
		
			Not sure what you mean by fittings, but the baca baca was not made from aluminium. the metal is coppery in color and you can see green precipitates/stain still uncleaned in the pic which indicate that it is some form of copper alloy? However at the base of the baca baca I guess previous owner added little clamps to tighten the baca baca I guess(?) and these pieces look like aluminium.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | ||
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Aug 2007 
				Location: Germany, Dortmund 
				
				
					Posts: 9,416
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 Regards, Detlef Last edited by Sajen; 1st April 2023 at 12:52 PM.  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Aug 2007 
				Location: Germany, Dortmund 
				
				
					Posts: 9,416
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Here you can see my example with integral gangya: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...highlight=kris You can see also that F. de Luzon is correct by the cloth wrapping in up from the scabbard. Regards, Detlef  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |