![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,237
|
![]()
Green, i don't believe that you actually have a separate gangya there. This is a kris from the latter part of the 20th Century (post WWII) and that is just an incised line in the blade meant to represent a gangya.
No, i would not say that you can date a blade based upon the absence or presence of this particular okir design. Not all blades carry such okir regardless of the age of the blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 323
|
![]()
Thank you David. I'll look closely at the ganya part when I recieve it, Looking at the pic again I think you are right.
A follow up Q is this. Do all 19th century or earlier blades have separate ganja ? And all blades without a separate ganja are of later make (20th century)? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|