|
|
|
20th December 2016, 11:22 AM
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
Last edited by Kulino; 20th December 2016 at 11:36 AM. |
|
|
|
|
20th December 2016, 11:47 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
I think it is probably valid to call this a sajen ampel, but it is much finer than any I have handled.
|
|
|
|
20th December 2016, 12:26 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 84
|
Any idea about age?
What does the kinatah tell? As far as I can tell it is a kind of lotus. Nothing like an anggrek. |
|
|
|
|
20th December 2016, 08:02 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
Please let me have a good, clear close-up of the base of the blade, taken at 90 degrees.
I may or may not be able to give an opinion. |
|
|
|
|
20th December 2016, 08:38 PM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 84
|
thank you for your trouble
|
|
|
|
|
20th December 2016, 08:43 PM
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,085
|
Based upon what I can see in the photos, this is a North Coast Jawa tombak, probably classifiable as Tuban, quality is not as fine as I had thought from the previous photos, the factor that puts it into a lower class being that it is metuk iras.
I am not prepared to take any guesses at age, nor at the design factors. |
|
|
|
|
21st December 2016, 04:44 PM
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 84
|
Dear Alan,
Could you please elaborate on the Mentuk Iras? |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
