![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 183
|
Looks modern to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,242
|
Oh I understand, the collector was old, the friend was old, so the dagger must be old too. May be, but the bajonet M 1916 is old too
corrado26 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
Here is your M1916. Are you really sure, that this is the same blade? Roland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,242
|
This is not a M/16-LEBEL bajonet! Look at the foto of a Lebel-M/16 and compare
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
The Lebel has a round base but the base of the dagger is rectangular! The middle ridge of the Lebel is thicker than the dagger and finally the tip is completely different. I am sure, this blade doesn't come from a Lebel or another well known mass produced bayonet. Roland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Black Forest, Germany
Posts: 1,242
|
Please, have a look to post 7
corrado26 |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|