![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
![]()
latten-inlaid decorations
Last edited by Cerjak; 21st May 2016 at 07:50 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
![]()
latten inlaid
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Magnificent sword, Jean-Luc.
I wish i could spot marks similar to those, but ... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
![]()
Hi Fernando,
Thank you for your kind comment,for the star I have found a similar on one medieval blade ( see http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=20883 Best Jean-Luc |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,594
|
![]()
Hi Jean Luc,
Beautiful great sword!!! and for all I can see, in my opinion this may well be a Passau sword, and of the period you suggest. These latten markings could well have been punched in later, but certainly later in the 15th into 16th as the markings comparable I have seen date slightly later. The 'heart' and cross was a known Passau inlay (Cronau, 1885 p.18; Kinman p.65) end of 15th c. but the heart was usually inverted from the cross. The encircled cross is the cross crosslet it seems was earlier use and by the 15th century the cross fourchee encircled was more commonly seen. This cross form may well have been used anachronistically or aligned more with specific conventions such as order or other imbuement. The 'star' is not really a star but appears an interpretation on the 'pi' marks used in Milan early, actually a crown atop two 'tails'. This is of course a highly stylized version, but these kinds of stylizations (common on latten inlays) were known used by Stantlers around early 16thc . While the early 16th century seems late for these types of swords, it is noted that the forms often remained in use well after the period used in the classifications and forms could remain in use concurrently and transcending those guidelines. Thus more accurate dating is difficult based on style or even these markings which as noted might have been set later. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Jim McDougall]Hi Jean Luc,
the markings comparable I have seen date slightly later. The 'heart' and cross was a known Passau inlay (Cronau, 1885 p.18; Kinman p.65) end of 15th c. but . Dear Jim In this Sword from Nadrlje, Serbia we have the same symbols ( heart and cross only the location for the cross is under the heart. Best Jean-Luc |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 140
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
![]()
Hello Reventlov,
Thank you for your comment ,Do you have some pictures for similar marks ? If yes could you post it here ? best CERJAK Has any one ever seen a list or count of swords with this mark, or tried to compile one themselves? So far I have counted 10 examples... the swords I have found seem to be generally distributed in Eastern Europe; the western-most example is one in Germany (one of the Sempach swords), the rest I have found are the two in Serbia, and others from Poland, Slovakia... one is in the Hermitage, and one more was also from Alexandrian armoury.[/QUOTE] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
If Jasper came around i bet he might wish to add some conclusions on both sword and marks
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,594
|
![]() Quote:
Hope so. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
I was paging the catalog of Schweizerischen Landsmuseum and latten-inlaid symbols not equal but suggesting same type of attitude, were practiced during the XVI century, as you pointed out. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|