WOOTZ or SHAM?

MABAGANI · 30th January 2006, 03:45 PM

One cut slamming edges of a wootz vs. non-wootz blade could've also given an immediate but costly answer, too, ouch...
Wet clay, interestingly for testing could give feedback and practice for- line, angle, aim, quality, etc on a stationary target without damaging the edge. I'll have to try it some time.
So were wootz blades more difficult for smiths to master and an expensive commodity reserved for the elite warriors and/or wealthy?

30th January 2006, 03:45 PM	#32
MABAGANI Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 221	One cut slamming edges of a wootz vs. non-wootz blade could've also given an immediate but costly answer, too, ouch... Wet clay, interestingly for testing could give feedback and practice for- line, angle, aim, quality, etc on a stationary target without damaging the edge. I'll have to try it some time. So were wootz blades more difficult for smiths to master and an expensive commodity reserved for the elite warriors and/or wealthy?