![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Buraimi Oman, on the border with the UAE
Posts: 4,408
|
![]() Quote:
Salaams Jim, Thank you for the fine article in itself a great research document and as I was looking at Sir Richard Burton I noted Sindh Revisited: A Journey in the Footsteps of Captain Sir ...1842 -1849 Regards, Ibrahiim al Balooshi. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Interesting article Jim, thank you for showing it.
GePi, The words Sind and Talpur have been mentioned several times, also in connection with your tulwar. However, your hilt is not a typical Talpur hilt, for such a hilt you will have to look at Jim's article at the last picture. The tulwar at the botton has a typical Talpur hilt. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 95
|
![]()
That's a lot of great information you guys are providing.
Quote:
I wonder if it is possible to track down this specific owner. Google searching the latin transliteration of his name has yielded no results unsurprisingly. Concerning the shape of the blade I was wondering if it could be an import, perhaps turkish, though it doesn't have the little "step"(?) that seperates the yelman from the rest of the blade on the kilij blades that I have seen. Although I'm a novice, I have looked at quite a few pictures of antique tulwars, and I have not seen this particular kind of blade shape with a tulwar hilt, or any other hilt to be honest, before. Quote:
The sword that pictured right above has a hilt with a shape very similar to the one on my sword though, perhaps traded in or gifted, as Jim mentioned. Quote:
yes, that could explain why it is still mostly bright and shiny under the dirt. Is there a way to verfiy that? Curious that it seems to have been neglected so badly afterwards. Thanks all, you've been of great help already. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|