![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]() Quote:
I am still pretty convinced, however, that this sheath is all one piece. Perhaps Leif will get back to us soon to confirm one way or the other. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
|
![]()
David, there are many examples in Solyoms book on pages 41, 42 and 47 and should be more in Haryoguritnos.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
I can't disagree Gustav, but I think, in this particular case, that it is as David says: a deep scratch.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
|
![]()
That's possible, Rick.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Minneapolis,MN
Posts: 348
|
![]()
Firstly, thank you all for your thoughts on this.
I'm glad I was mostly right on the stuff I said. I'm also glad I didn't pay terribly much for these. Mostly, I still likely them, and I'm happy to have an opportunity to learn. It's strange how much easier it is to seem flaws with something (in this case the ricikan on the Surakarta Keris) once someone else points them out. Secondly, it does infact seem to be a iras scabbard. I'll try to post some pics in the morning. The mark visible is indeed a deep scratch. Also, the wood inside the pendok is in not great condition. Thanks, Leif |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|