Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 15th January 2016, 10:35 PM   #1
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harrywagner
Maybe, but from a woodworkers perspective that is exactly how you would want to do it. The angle increases the surface area of the joint which makes it stronger.
Harry, while i do understand what you are saying, if you spend some time looking at how the gander is generally fitted to the wrongko in these sheaths from this area i think you will see that it is just not the general woodworker's perspective from this culture.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2016, 11:04 PM   #2
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
Default

Actually the place and angle for a joint line here is not unusual, for Solo style wrongko. For a better taste the angle could be perhaps even steeper and the line located a bit deeper.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2016, 11:29 PM   #3
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
Actually the place and angle for a joint line here is not unusual, for Solo style wrongko. For a better taste the angle could be perhaps even steeper and the line located a bit deeper.
You will have to show me examples of that Gustav. On most of the solo sheaths that i have the angle of the joint is less severe if there is an angle at all and the joint does not take place this far down the gandar. With some the joint is right up into the wrongko.
I am still pretty convinced, however, that this sheath is all one piece. Perhaps Leif will get back to us soon to confirm one way or the other.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2016, 11:45 PM   #4
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
Default

David, there are many examples in Solyoms book on pages 41, 42 and 47 and should be more in Haryoguritnos.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2016, 12:01 AM   #5
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
Smile

I can't disagree Gustav, but I think, in this particular case, that it is as David says: a deep scratch.
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2016, 12:17 AM   #6
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
Default

That's possible, Rick.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2016, 03:20 AM   #7
Rafngard
Member
 
Rafngard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Minneapolis,MN
Posts: 348
Default

Firstly, thank you all for your thoughts on this.

I'm glad I was mostly right on the stuff I said.
I'm also glad I didn't pay terribly much for these.

Mostly, I still likely them, and I'm happy to have an opportunity to learn. It's strange how much easier it is to seem flaws with something (in this case the ricikan on the Surakarta Keris) once someone else points them out.

Secondly, it does infact seem to be a iras scabbard. I'll try to post some pics in the morning. The mark visible is indeed a deep scratch.

Also, the wood inside the pendok is in not great condition.

Thanks,
Leif
Rafngard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.