Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21st December 2015, 03:23 PM   #1
David
Keris forum moderator
 
David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pusaka
David, from my point of view it is the Muslims who embraced pre Islamic internal practices in Indonesia that were Taoist and Vedic in origin. Muhammad was no yogi, you cant find these things in the quran, they are absent in arab nations which says something. The spiritual practices in Kebatinan such as meditation, concentration on energy centres (chakras), breathing exercises (pranayama) all of that is not Islamic in origin.
The goal of Kebatinan is to develop rasa, the intuitive knowing of the heart, that word Rasa is Sanskrit in origin.
Pusaka, are you at all familiar with Sufism? Meditation and breathe control are indeed a part of the practice. It is the mystical aspects of Islam (Sufism) that is embraced in Kebabtinan, not what is practiced in mundane forms of that religion.
I do think that this side debate we are having has absolutely nothing to do with the aspects of the keris that either you or i wish to be discussing however. Why don't we turn our attention back there. Perhaps you could put forth exactly what it is you are hoping to discover through this line of inquiry around Candi Sukuh in regards to the keris.

Last edited by David; 21st December 2015 at 03:41 PM.
David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2015, 06:23 PM   #2
Pusaka
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David
Pusaka, are you at all familiar with Sufism? Meditation and breathe control are indeed a part of the practice. It is the mystical aspects of Islam (Sufism) that is embraced in Kebabtinan, not what is practiced in mundane forms of that religion.
I do think that this side debate we are having has absolutely nothing to do with the aspects of the keris that either you or i wish to be discussing however. Why don't we turn our attention back there. Perhaps you could put forth exactly what it is you are hoping to discover through this line of inquiry around Candi Sukuh in regards to the keris.
Your right, so I agree to disagree on this one
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=...dom%22&f=false


At the moment my main interest is to find out if this mythical empu Ramayadi was a figure in hindu mythology and if so I want to know what he is known by in Indian texts. It would appear to be so because I read he also made Krishnas chariot.
Pusaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2015, 08:25 PM   #3
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,990
Default

Pusaka, may I enquire exactly where you read that Ramayadi made Krishna's chariot?
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2015, 08:35 PM   #4
Pusaka
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by A. G. Maisey
Pusaka, may I enquire exactly where you read that Ramayadi made Krishna's chariot?
I have been searching for the last few days trying to track down if he is a character in Hindu text, one text I came across said he made Krishna's chariot and another text said he made Vishnu's chakram disc...I'm still searching and have not pinned this down yet...but I will
Pusaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2015, 09:04 PM   #5
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,990
Default

Thanks for your response Pusaka. Do you recall the names of your sources?

I'm asking, because there is a lot of very dubious information available these days, most especially from web sources. We need to not only find the information sought, but also to verify the source. The web has made a lot of things easier, but at the same time more difficult.

That line of descent first appears in Pangeran Wijil's babad "Silsilah Mpu Tanah Jawa".

It does not appear as a strict line of descent, but must be composed from an analysis of the text. Because of this, there are variations in interpretation. The analysis that must be undertaken is not easy and requires strict adherence to analytical principles.

A further difficulty is that this babad is in Hanacaraka, which means that for a long time, translation to a Romanised text, or even to B.I. has been required before the analysis could be undertaken.

There is some disagreement as to which Pangeran Wijil wrote the babad. Some say it was written in Kartosuro before the move to Surakarta, others say it was written at a later date in Surakarta.

The text itself is very probably the foundation upon which the much later works that generated the Surakarta Tangguh System were built.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2015, 09:05 PM   #6
Pusaka
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 341
Default

"Bathara Anggajali is the son Bathara Ramadi / Ramayadi, an expert blacksmith who was appointed as a god. Just like his father, also a blacksmith Bathara Anggajali reliable and skilled. Bathara Anggajali served atop Mount Jamurdipa to create powerful weapons belonged to the gods. In addition Bathara Anggajali also merge weapons and spell-spell of the evil kings and knights in the crater Chandradimuka. In the beginning, before being appointed to the gods, MPU Anggajali is a favorite of King Mahapunggung blacksmith, king Medhang Kamulan.


The weapons which were the work of Bathara Anggajali include:
-Trisula And Kyai Cis belonging Bathara Jaludara Teachers.
-Bajra (Lightning spear) belonging Bathara Indra.
-Busur Wijaya and Armor belonging Bathara Sun Solar.
-Pedang Chandrasa belongs Bathara Chandra.
-Cakra Baskara / Sudarshana Chakra belong Bathara Vishnu.
-Golok Way belongs Bathara Rudra and Bathara Yamadipati.
-Keris Kaladite-Kalanadhah of canine right-left and Arrow Pasopati of the tongue Bathara Kala.
-Kyai Kuntawijaya Danu previously belonged to Arjuna that eventually captured by Karna."
http://caritawayang.blogspot.com/201...i-bathara.html
Pusaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2015, 09:26 PM   #7
Pusaka
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 341
Default

A.G.Maisey, thanks for the info. I am stuck to using the web and even worse translated versions.

My interest was inspired by recalling what a guru told me, he said his teacher the sat guru believed the first keris was made by empu ramayadi under instruction of a saint who taught him the use of the 16 metals.

Well it stuck in my head for years and then recently I discovered there is text called: Caritaning Wesi saking panembahan karang (Treatise on the qualities, physical and spiritual, of diffrent irons used in forging of keris. The teachings of panembahan karang (Bathara Mudhik) to Empu Ramayadi)

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=...page&q&f=false


So it would appear the story I was told is at least legitimate "mythology"
Pusaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2015, 05:58 AM   #8
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,990
Default

Yes, legitimate mythology, certainly.

A nice turn of phrase.

Those works listed in Nancy Florida's work are freely available for access at the Mangkunegaraan Library in Solo. During the 1980's I made photo-copies of all keris related books and manuscripts in that library, and the ones in Hanacaraka I had translated to B.I., I had a few of the romanised Javanese ones translated also, even in roman letters older Javanese is not so easy to read.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2015, 08:31 PM   #9
Pusaka
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 341
Default

Found this and thought it was quite interesting, note it starts with Empu ramayadi
Attached Images
 
Pusaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.