![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
![]()
Anyone have any idea about the origin of this proof mark?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 803
|
![]()
That mark reminds me very much of the Swedish mark, seen on arms made by Carl Gustav.
Richard. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
![]() Quote:
Any examples? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 412
|
![]()
Lotfy,
The mark also resembles (and I mean resembles) an Englsh government inspectors mark. These were a mark of quality control applied to arms intended for British goverment use. They are frequenly found on the well known " Khyber" copies of EIC firearms that still fool an awful lot of people. I have not, as far as I can remember, seen them on any "Khyber" blades, but they do appear on British military issue swords of the mid 19th Cent. and later. I have a nimcha type saif which has a blade in European style but which shows signs of a mechanical watering which in my opinion is almost unheard of in a European blade. I suggest it is a possibilty that your blade is Indian or Pakistani made, in a European style, and with a spurios stamp, to give it a bit of extra clout. As far as I am aware many of these copies were contemporary with the original. Regards Richard |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
![]() Quote:
The blade is of good quality, and the finish is great. It could be added later but there was no shortage of British blades in the region. I guess a comparative example would be nice. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|