![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
I don't know much about these, but the mark is Victorian British, royal.
Perhaps Jim or one of our British members can offer additional information on the mark and the pattern blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,875
|
![]()
Andrews right, British Victorian machete, which could have been used in any tropical environment. There are many styles of British machete that were used in west Africa and else where no doubt. It is also quite possible that an item like this may have seen life as a boarding weapon. Tim
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,449
|
![]()
I agree with Tim, this item is likely a trade blade mounted as a machete in one of the tropical colonial regions. While the blade carries an appantly British arsenal stamp, this I believe is a Solingen made trade blade of mid 19th century, most likely by Kirschbaum (according to reference in "Boarders Away" by W.Gilkerson, 1991, p.88). The author of this book illustrates some very similar heavy chopping blades of this type and indicates the popularity of early cutlass blades caused these blades to be continued well into the 19th century. The British crown with Victorian letters below appears to emulate that practice used on the Georgian examples, while typically the Victorian stamping did not use that particular arrangement if I am not mistaken (after reviewing material in appendix, Robson, "Swords of the British Army"
I have always very much favored these heavy type blades, and they remind me a great deal of the colonial Spanish 'espada anchas', which typically had the upturned point as well. Best regards, Jim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|