![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,308
|
![]()
It is possible that the scabbard is a later replacement. I base this on the style of workmanship. If so this might explain some of the questions regarding the scabbard.
Certainly the stone on top next to the hilt is a later addition. Traditionally Ottomans did not place one there (and it would fall of anyway) and there is the issue of the style of stone setting which is more modern and not traditionally Ottoman. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
The wooden grip are clearly modern replacement.
The scabbard looks good to me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 439
|
![]()
The stone on the sword in question is faceted, which implies, to me at any rate, a (relatively) modern origin. Its setting seems consistent with the rest of the fittings on the hilt.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]()
I still have not seen anything similar to this yatagan, here are some additional pictures. 28 inches long.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
I like your yatagan, the date on the blade is 1825.
Is the central part of the scabbard silver? Congrat!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,492
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
In the last set of pics, the fourth from below, scabbard fitting: isn't there a half-moon and a star?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|