![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
![]() Quote:
This is some extra pictures from the guard Best Cerjak |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 412
|
![]()
Hello Jean Luc,
The way the blade fits into the guard and its position vs the guard plate or how the rim of the plate fits the blade makes me think this is re-used blade. I believe the blade is changed in its working life because it has the same overall pitting. I can't see the surface of the pommel enough, does it have the same pitting? It is the correct model pommel for this rapier. Kind regards Ulfberth |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you very much for your imput about this rapier. Yes the pommel has the same pitting ,I aggree your opinion that this sword could have a re-used blade changed in working period as all elements are in the same state of conservation with the same pitting. Best Jean-Luc |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 412
|
![]()
Hi Jean Luc,
you are welcome, Yes this picture of the pommel clearly shows the same patina/pitting and it is exactly the same overall, this is a good sign and proves the rapier is historically correct . ![]() kind regards Ulfberth |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|