![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
It's a Persian Qajar revival piece. These are 19th century reproductions of earlier styles. Not normally made for use.
Welcome to the forum. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Usually, I admire Artzi's taste and choice very much.
This particular acquisition left me speechless: Qajar revival swords are , in my opinion, nonfunctional, ceremonial, poor quality, tasteless and downright ugly ![]() ![]() Does he know something about this sword I don't? ![]() Or, did he get a special request from a customer who collects poor quality, tasteless ceremonial swords? ![]() Last edited by ariel; 23rd December 2005 at 09:28 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Poland, Krakow
Posts: 418
|
![]()
I exactly understand what you mean Ariel, and if I was collecting Persian arms I would like to buy only those best examples from Safavid period. Those from Qajar times are indeed quite poor - super perfect and high quality steel cut is replaces by not perfect etching, damasce steel by poor quality and fast getting rusty steel, the beautiful ornaments and great caligraphy by something less perfect.... but! Yes there is one but. Let me quote prof. Tadeusz Majda's words from his catalogue of "Persian Art 1779-1924":
"(...)There is no doubt that Persian art of Qajar period is marked by its times - times of riots, wars, collapse of economy, influences of European countries and European arts, not always based on best sources. But it still has its special charm, characteristic with its simplicity, and what is more important, it reflects art taste of court, townspeoples, more than during Safavids rules. (...)" In further words, professor indicate mass production, market for European countries and America, contacts and orders from outside countries, etc., everything that changed the art and market in Persia. At the same time artists were trying to continue everything what Safavids and past generations created, so they purposely imitated patterns and art from passed centuries. And take a look at Europe in the 19th century, where we can observe the same process - neogothic, imitates of medieval, 16th and 17th centuries weapons, very often made of poor quality metals - everything what could remind passed centuries. People of this time felt they were missing those all things that passed away. So from this piont o view all these buildings, arts and other things of this period are somehow charming too ![]() Regards! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Perhaps, you are right....
The 19th century was a time when swords and daggers started to lose their practical value; firearms became so efficient that the military tactics had to be revised. Cold steel became decorational and ceremonial and, as a result, became either unnecessarily ornate (Caucasian weapons) or of limited quality. Yes, there still were some fabulous blades produced and there were some "old time" exploits (The Light Brigade-type), but the writing was on the wall. Less industrial societies lagged behind in this regard and Moro weapons, for example, were still of high standard but any army aiming to become competitive by necessity abandoned the chivalrous swordplay and concentrated on firearms. Still, Qajar swords strike me as particularly ungainly and of exceptionally low quality and appeal. There tin-plate blades with crude etching, cheap and garish decoration and exaggerated size just scream "Phony!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]() Quote:
Reviewing the items he bought, I can tell you that I admire his taste also... But if you take a look at his shop, you will find a similar example wich is for sale (acutally already on hold) for a considerable higher sum... I guess that Mr. Artzi, despite his incomparable taste, is good at math too.. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Haifa, Israel
Posts: 183
|
![]()
I refrained from commenting on this thread, but since it was brought up again, I wish to post a short remark:
Ariel, Thank you for your compliments. I am afraid we do not share the same taste in swords. I have examined considerable number of these ”ugly” revival swords. They have their beauty, they represent a certain tradition and culture and quite many of them are forged from very good steel, in spite of their main use as ceremonial. I am not sure as to this specific sword as I did not receive it yet, but when I do I will gladly post my opinion on it. Above all, many collectors collect them and regard them as beautiful. I will however refrain from commenting on Valjhun last post. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,287
|
![]()
Mr. Valjuhn , I find your last remark to be uncalled for and in poor taste .
You have a PM . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
|
![]()
It was not my intention to be rude and please don't consider my previous post to be offensive...
My appologise to Mr. Yarom and to all of you, but it seems that you all have missunderstood my previous thought. I've made only an observation and Mr Rick, I certainly haven't interferred with Mr. Yaroms personal business, wich besides isn't any personal but rather pubblic on a verry well known website. I'm also happy that I was his client many times in the past and I was always happy with the stuff I've got, 'cos he is one of the few honest dealers out there. Further I also consider him a great expert about oriental arms and I often think why he does not write a book wich would be verry appreciated among us, rather novice collectors. Certainly worth buying instead of some other expensive stuff with glossy paper, blurry photos and missleading descriptions from a "venerable" guru-connosieur. I've made only an observation about the real value of taht blade, wich everyone here can make. Besides, to buy things you sell for a resonable price, with the intention of making profit, is exactly what traders do. Beeing a proffessional seller mayself, I'm certainly not considering that shamefull nor anybody should consider it shamefull. The item in questin was legally bought on an open auction and every single one of us could bid on it and Mr. yaroms shop is also open to all visitors. I'm not divulgating any top secret data here. Again, I just made an observation, that the sword is more valuable of that it was payed for, to alleviate Mr. Ariels ammusement. What's really wrong with that? Last edited by Valjhun; 19th January 2006 at 09:36 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Having re-read my original comment and Artzi's reply, I am blushing.... I tried to be funny but it obviously came across as quite rude. I apologize.
![]() We do have different tastes in arms and we all are entitled to our opinions ( I still do not like Qajar swords!) but there is no reason to be sarcastic and smart-alecky. Once again, my apologies. I'll try to watch myself in the future. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|