![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
I see what you mean, but the way the collectors are, old as new, I think it will be difficult to change.
The best to do when it comes to discussing weapons is, to provide good pictures, and a good description. With the keris' like with the katars, there are so many variations that a classification will be more than difficult - unless it is a very rough one. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,989
|
![]()
Actually Jens, there is a very well established system of classification that is used with keris, but it is virtually useless unless one is able to adopt a Javanese frame of reference.
I do agree, that in discussion of weapons, or for that matter, any physical object, good photographs and relevant data are second only to the presence of the item under discussion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Do you know the keris' Holstein shows in his book/s?
If not I can show them on the Keries forum. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|