![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
I changed my mind. I spot one with a date 1866.
They are all from Turkey. Maybe some stuff from regular Ottoman army?? I hope that a member has a proper answer... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: AUCKLAND,NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 624
|
![]()
GREETINGS
THE ONES POSTED HERE LOOK LIKE 50s-60s MADE,SO I WOULD SAY VINTAGE BUT NOT ANTIQUES,TURKEY LIKE INDIA AND MORROCO HAVE LOTS OF REPRODUCTIONS AS TOO MUCH DEMAND FROM THE TOURIST MARKETS/SOUKS .PLEASE CHECK EBAY AND ONE WOULD SEE 1000s OF FAKE INDO-PERSIAN ARMS COMMING OUT OF INDIA,CHEERS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
You are probably right Rajesh. It's easy to copy a date on a touristic object.
Are they touristic objects from Turkey or Iran? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
![]()
We get into a yes and no answer on items like these. let us say you have 5 of these primers in the souq. 2 get sold to goat farmers,1 to some rebel in the hills, and 2 to tourist. Is the piece tourist or not? These are functional.
Some of the pistols, knifes, and swords sold in the souq would not stand the first use without being seriously damaged or destroyed. Those particular items are obviously made for just decoration and sold to tourist. Yemen daggers are another example of this. Men have worn these for years and I am sure the same craftsman that sold to them also sold to tourist. Last edited by ward; 25th July 2015 at 03:48 PM. Reason: spelling mistake |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
antoher one in my library.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,361
|
![]()
Ward, I think you are saying that if an item was made for an intended purpose/use, and it happens to be bought by a collector/tourist then it is still a valid artifact from that culture. Therefore, if it was not made for an intended use, it is a piece of commercial decorative art that may have some value but is not the real deal. Is that correct?
This is an issue that has been debated by antique collectors, dealers and artists for years and I have not heard a consensus emerge. Perhaps this is an issue we could address in a separate thread if you would like to start one. Ian. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
![]()
Yes Ian that is a good summary. The line drawn on tourist or not is iffy at best.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 637
|
![]()
I believe that knife would be hard pressed to keep a sharp edge. So I would classify that item as decorative.
A lot of qajar weapons fall into the religious festival use so again a iffy subject. Other cultures have their own various reenactments or celebrations. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|