![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
I forgot to mention that the blade is single edge but 2 edges the last 25 cm
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
a nice old picture from 1865
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,719
|
Any markings on the blade?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
Quote:
Infortunatly there isn"t any marks on the blade. Best Cerjak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,719
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
Quote:
I think it is correct to date this blade around the 18 th century . best Cerjak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
From the limited photos, this blade does not look European to me. Likely, locally-made Sukhela or Dhup. 18th century is possible, but the first half of the 19th is also probable: 200 years old, give or take. In any case, it is older than my mother-in-law.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|