![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,660
|
![]() Quote:
The swords you are referencing in the linked thread are actually also from the Caribbean, most likely the Dominican Republic in particular. And yes, there is a nice similar Cuban sword with a shell guard in that thread as well, with Jim providing a very good explanation of its attribution. Regards, Teodor |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
Hi Teodor,
Are you sure? Because I have seen such swords with nice African scabbards... Who were copies of old Portuguese scabbards... May be the link is the Portuguese, not the Spanish. Best, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,660
|
![]() Quote:
I am not sure how the Berber attribution started: I suspect it may have been Tirri's notoriously erroneous catalog. I am yet to see any evidence which shows these swords in a North African context. On the other hand we have a sword with attribution in the Toledo Museo del Ejercito and a few swords with inscriptions in Spanish on the blade which reference the Dominican Republic or parts of it. Regards, Teodor |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 20
|
![]()
Many thanks to everybody who helped me to get an answer to the question of determination of this interesting sword!
So it seems to be that it is used by the “Chasseurs del Rey”, a kind of gendarmerie in Cuba already 1803 based on a proper description of handle and blade (but without illustration). By regular troops in Cuba it was a service sword “Modelo 1891 para la Infantería del Ejército de Cuba”, typo Deguanabacoa, based on an article of Juan L. Calvó in an auction catalog 2007. There are still some questions: Is the rare form of handles really based on African slaves? In 1803 the Viceroyalty of New Spain was still in existence, could it be a Mexican / Aztec / Maya motive? What is with the row of deeply incised sickle and arrow motives in the blade? Perhaps somebody will find an answer. Thanks again Udo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]()
I don't believe it has Aztec/Maya characteristics at all. I see more Spanish influence than anything else. This may explain the Berber attribution, since Spain ruled the Spanish Sahara (and still has a presence in Morocco).
Yes for sure Caribbean (Cuba, etc) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|