![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
|
![]()
Some of the Shan States are not part of China due to colonial agreements between the British and Chinese. I'd also point out that the map does not show the Shan States or State singular these days, but a very generalized map of ethnic regions in Burma.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
Would the map have been more accurate tribally speaking 50 or 100 years ago? If not can provide a more accurate map particularilary of around 1900? Although for sake of knowledge a currant map would also be interesting to compare, how things have changed. Spiral Last edited by spiral; 19th September 2014 at 08:37 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
|
![]()
Spiral,
I know enough about cartography and the bewildering complexity that is/was/shall be Burma's ethnic mixture to know that vouching for the accuracy of any map, especially without explicit parameters laid out, is a fool's errand. Take for example the Shan States. Sounds easy enough to define but...well, like I said, a fool's errand. If you really are serious, I would suggest finding a copy of Martin Smith's "Burma: Insurgency and the Politics of Ethnicity" and read and chapters 2,3,5 and 16. It certainly won't answer your questions, but it is certainly more concise and informed answer than I'll ever be able to give you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]() Quote:
spiral |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|