Sulu kris with ivory horse hoof pommel

DaveS · 22nd May 2014, 06:45 PM

David: Yes, you could be right. The inscised line are definitely not done to the same standards as the rest of the blade. Only question is, are these lines and the centipede??? like engraving done by the same person? Looks to me that the quality of both indicates they were done by two different people.......Dave.

David · 22nd May 2014, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveS

…the centipede??? like engraving…

I must say i'm a bit skeptical this was intended to be a centipede. It doesn't look like any of the other more obvious centipede markings i've seen on these blades, even the simplest renderings of the bug. It looks more like a tree or something more plant-like. I don't see anything like pinchers, even in a extremely stylized manner, that would lead me to think centipede. Doesn't mean the "tree" (if it is that) doesn't still have some talismanic purpose. I do think, however, that we are sometimes too quick to ascribe every little line and design on a blade as "talismanic".

Battara · 23rd May 2014, 12:09 AM

Sorry to join in so late. Yes I agree with David in his observations. The lines seem later to me. DaveS I also think the blade is earlier than the hilt.

Regarding the centipede: this is actually a vegetative motif seen on other blades, not a centipede (again agreeing with David). Usually the centipede motif is in "movement" and a little wider from what I have seen on Moro blades so far.

DaveS · 23rd May 2014, 01:30 AM

David, Jose: I agree with you both that too often we ascribe every little line on a moro kris as well as other weapons to be "talismanic" in some way. Sadly in most cases, we will never really know the intent of these engravings..........Dave.

kino · 23rd May 2014, 03:14 PM

Where have you been hiding this one Dave? Like Vandoo said " pleasing to the eye"

DaveS · 23rd May 2014, 09:16 PM

Albert: I just got this one about a month ago, so i didn't have it at Eugene. There is something "pleasing to the eye" about this kris. I just haven't figured out what it is.............Dave.

22nd May 2014, 06:45 PM	#1
DaveS Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 327	David: Yes, you could be right. The inscised line are definitely not done to the same standards as the rest of the blade. Only question is, are these lines and the centipede??? like engraving done by the same person? Looks to me that the quality of both indicates they were done by two different people.......Dave.

23rd May 2014, 12:09 AM	#3
Battara EAAF Staff Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Louisville, KY Posts: 7,272	Sorry to join in so late. Yes I agree with David in his observations. The lines seem later to me. DaveS I also think the blade is earlier than the hilt. Regarding the centipede: this is actually a vegetative motif seen on other blades, not a centipede (again agreeing with David). Usually the centipede motif is in "movement" and a little wider from what I have seen on Moro blades so far.

23rd May 2014, 01:30 AM	#4
DaveS Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 327	David, Jose: I agree with you both that too often we ascribe every little line on a moro kris as well as other weapons to be "talismanic" in some way. Sadly in most cases, we will never really know the intent of these engravings..........Dave.

23rd May 2014, 03:14 PM	#5
kino Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,018	Where have you been hiding this one Dave? Like Vandoo said " pleasing to the eye"

23rd May 2014, 09:16 PM	#6
DaveS Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 327	Albert: I just got this one about a month ago, so i didn't have it at Eugene. There is something "pleasing to the eye" about this kris. I just haven't figured out what it is.............Dave.