Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 26th February 2014, 07:01 PM   #1
blue lander
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 456
Default

Interesting, thank you. I've looked through some online databases of yataghan bayonets, and it looks like Remington ones have unchamfered hilt slots. Mine's chamfered, which make me assume it was for a chassepot.

Old smithy's database mentions a Remington bayonet "marked with Alex Coppel balance on left side of blade and has a "C" in a circle on the right hand side. Has un chamfered hilt slot" That's close to mine except mine has a "B" instead of a "C" and the hilt slot on mine is chamfered.
Attached Images
 
blue lander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2014, 11:53 PM   #2
Fernando K
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 672
Default

Hello:

I live in Argentina, and I am a lover of history of the weapons used. I assure you the Comblain came to be used long after 1871, as the link says, and breechloaders first came into use in 1873 (Remington rifle, Robert, who was a convert to the Springfield breech). Notwithstanding this, some weapons retrocrga, conversion of muzzleloaders, such as the Albini-Brandlin, but were never officially adopted.

Affectionately. Fernando K

Sorry for the translator
Fernando K is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.