![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,376
|
From the picture I'm seeing no T shaped spine , and a false edge ?
Aside from the hilt it looks a bit like a Kirach blade . There certainly is a confusing variety in the E.W.'s of India . Should we start to classify Khyber/Salawar Yataghans by blade features ? Oh yes , and just when I had stated that I'd never seen a Khyber with a ricasso someone comes up with one . http://www.ashokaarts.com/edgedweapons/ew-46.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
Sorry for joining so late. I believe the two different types Ariel shows are due to tribal differences, like stated earlier.
Rick, I think N2s is playing tricks on us, showing only part of the sword. I think I see a false edge too, and do I also see a ricasso? I too was surprised to see a Khyper knife with a ricasso, and I am with you about the ‘artistic license’, but I don’t buy RobT’s suggestion about expanding the area, where these knifes was used, widely. Sometimes Afghanistan was a province of Persia, and sometimes of India – it was even at times regarded part of India – not a province. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|