![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 317
|
![]()
It is interesting but not Persian, at first look I thought Indian. As I kept looking more and more, and try to make sense of the rubishy inscription, I think it might have been built to try and trick someone into thinking this is a Persian blade by Assadullah. Since there are parts of the inscription that could be mistaken as that. Interesting non the less. Could it be an older movie prop? Just saying that since I was watching Sinbad the Sailor today and they had lots of decent looking prop shamshirs and what not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,190
|
![]() Quote:
It would appear we crossed posts as I had just made some notes on this sabre in the previous post . I think it is important to note that these trade blades were actually well made blades, and not intended necessarily to fool anyone. The Persian blades of this general form were also produced in Chechnya in the Caucusus, and the cartouches and allusions to Assad Allah were more to signify imbued quality. A great reference is "The Persian Shamshir and the Signature of Assad Allah by Oliver Pinchot, "Arms Collector", Vol 40, #1, Feb 2002. I assure you this is not a movie prop from Sinbad movies!! ![]() but those movies are indeed fun to watch. Gotta love those 'scimitars'!!! Best regards, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,086
|
![]()
In the last picture, if you look closely you can see that the blade is pattern welded and not wootz. And it seems to be a rather bold pattern weld. Would it be possible to get some good pictures of the pattern on the blade? From what I can see in that picture, the pattern weld is much more typical to India than the patterned blades you would expect from the Caucasus and not wootz as you would expect from a Persian trade blade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,190
|
![]() Quote:
I had also not noticed that the tip of the blade is quite more distorted in shape than these type of Persian trade blades and the brass cartouches and devices are not only far more excessive in grouping but not like the Persian examples. With Artzi's much respected opinion and concisely well placed note, along with the others I must agree that this is far more likely to be a product of India from 20th century. I did enjoy my wistful trip into the British Raj though with my ideas inspired by this attractive example, as well as the images of the Sinbad movies AJ! ![]() Even if this is 20th century product, it still seems quite well made and of more vintage than the kind of things out of Rajasthan in more recent years. All best regards, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
Blade looks very clumsy & I would guess fairly heavy?
spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 409
|
![]()
I don't want to come across as a negative old fart, but wouldn't discount a recent Chinese fake.
Sorry Richard |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
|
![]()
I think before discussing any features, the clear distinction has to be made - it is not an antique sword. Not to offend any new swords collectors, I am just curious, does it really matter whether it is well made fake or not?
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Haifa, Israel
Posts: 183
|
![]()
In my modest opinion, I agree with Alnakkas. Very late 20C. blade from India. The pattern welded steel is very similar to so many “Damascus” blades from India flooding the market.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|