![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,340
|
![]()
I am not very firm by this area of collecting but I don't think that this dagger is a "tourist" dagger, like you I see that there are clear signs of excessive use. And the tourist daggers are much more fancy IMHO.
Regards, Detlef |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 456
|
![]()
Unless I see evidence otherwise I'm happy to consider this a legit but very modern piece. Comparing the sheath to my Takouba scabbard, the leather on the dagger sheath is much shinier. I guess it spent less time in the desert.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 845
|
![]()
Hi blue lander,
Maybe I am wrong, but I am of the opinion it is not a very modern piece. I think it is what we could call "contemporary", maybe from seventies. As Sajen already wrote, very modern (and touristic) would really be more fancy. This was made for use. The shining scabbard could also mean, that it was used extensively (again as Sajen mentioned; polished by contact with clothing and unwashed hands), not only that it is new. Shinier scabbard should be a "positive" sign. You have authentic artefact, not a souvenier. Martin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,719
|
![]()
To add to Martin's points, the heavy brass ring on the scabbard is a very good sign this is not entirely new. 21st century items typically have white metal or aluminium instead.
While this is certainly a 20th century item, it is authentic I think as well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 456
|
![]()
Thanks all - pleased that it's the real deal. I never considered that shiny leather was a sign of age, but that makes sense now that you explain it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|