![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#17 | |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,610
|
![]() Quote:
![]() It rather distorts the 'ballock' analogy yes? I always thought it interesting that particular anatomical allusion allegedly led the cautious Victorians to determine a less suggestive term by calling it a 'kidney dagger'. While the lobes clearly appear to be typically in two, I always wonder if there is any symbolic significance or is the configuration simply an aesthetic? With that, the triple lobe arrangement even more begs the question, why the lobes? Thank you both again for these fascinating topics and all that you both do in your phenomenal entries on these pages!!!! All the best, Jim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|