![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() My response: Thanks Nando! Like with most etymology in varying languages, it seems that terms used somewhat indiscriminately for knife/sword seem more focused on its use (cutting) than on its form. Most references I have seen on hunting swords use the couteau du chasse (Nuemann for example) while others often favor the German 'hirschfanger' for hunting swords. The term hanger seems to become even broader referring to military use of these shorter swords as officers often carried their own personal hunting/court type weapons. As swords of this shorter nature often carried by other ranks were comparable in size I suppose the term became associated further ? Last edited by Jim McDougall; 13th December 2013 at 09:23 PM. Reason: meant to quote not edit ..another oops |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: France
Posts: 12
|
![]()
Couteau, from Old French coutel, from Latin cultellus a little knife.
![]() Couteau really means "knife" in French, not sword or saber. Sword could be "épée", saber would be "sabre". Although it's always hard to know what the old use for these words used to be. I couldn't find an equivalent to the English term "hanger". The wikipedia page links to the French "sabre d'abordage" page, which would be a boarding sword. The collector who identified this sword as a "19th century german hunting sword" called it "dague" (dagger) and "couteau" -de chasse in the same email ... I didn't have time to take a picture of the blade today, but I can assure you again there are sadly no other markings. ![]() Thanks to all for your interest ! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
Fernando and Neekee thanks so much for the interesting data on the etymology. In the study of arms there has always been such confusion and misnomer and in learning about them sometimes the terms by which they are called are often as the history of the arms themselves. It does sometimes present problems though in researching development of certain forms from contemporary narratives etc. as all you have is a verbal description without visual assistance, and a misplaced term sends you down an entirely different path.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: France
Posts: 12
|
![]()
Maybe it would be good to update the thread title with the info provided ? I don't have the required authorizations, it seems.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
|
![]()
As noted Neekee. Thank you again for presenting this and the other interesting items you have shared.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|