Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 20th October 2013, 04:09 AM   #1
Dmitry
Member
 
Dmitry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miqueleter
Dmitry et al,

I agree, that hole has something to do with a belt hook. Fernando K nailed the makers. Nice pistol at any rate, though that broken top jaw sort of spoils the overall condition. Still, very handsome pistol.
Good call on the broken top jaw. I didn't notice that.
Here's another DOmingo Mas pistol, very similar to the topic starters. Still has the hook.
http://americanpowderhorns.com/?p=369
Dmitry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2013, 09:19 PM   #2
JamesKelly
Member
 
JamesKelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Michigan, U.S.A.
Posts: 108
Default

Thank you all for your replies.

I was not happy to hear the comment about broken top jaw, I had not noticed that. Thought it was just made that way. After all, wrought iron is ductile & should not just break off like that. Sometimes I forget my metallurgy after working in it a half century. So, I scrubbed off the gunk of ages using Automatic Transmission Fluid (a great cleaner) and bronze wool. Yep, it just fractured. I do not know why, perhaps a forging defect which just grew larger each time that very powerful mainspring slammed the flint into the steel. One can see the fracture at the end of that top jaw. At the very back end the metal is also smeared, which would have happened during continued use after the thing broke. Oh, well.
I looked closely at the iron ramrod. At first I thought it had a scarf weld of a piece of steel to the iron body. But there is no reason to have any steel-iron mix on this ramrod. Again scrubbed a little with ATF & bronze. The various lines that show might be defects in the iron from which this rod was forged. If a similar defect existed in the top jaw that might have been a reason for it breaking after repeated strikes. This pistol looks to have been fired a lot, as the steel is heavily worn. This lock has no provision for unscrewing & replacing the steel.
Of course, this is just speculation. but that is what one often does in a metallurgical failure analysis when one cannot get all the necessary information.(whoops! Did I do such an analysis for you on a high temperature fixture? We can chat off-line!)
Pleased to learn that it is in Heer's Neue Stockel. I have only the MCMXLIII paperback HAANDSKYDEVAABENS BEDØMMELSE II, JOHAN F. STØCKEL. Looked through each and every illustration last night as the Tigers (our Detroit baseball team) lost to Boston. No Domingo Mas. If I can find Neue Stockel in the Detroit library I shall photograph page 768
Dmitry, thanks for the post to a similar pistol by Domingo Mas. It even has about the same engraving under the main spring.
Attached Images
    
JamesKelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st October 2013, 05:28 PM   #3
Dmitry
Member
 
Dmitry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 607
Default

James, the broken top jaw can be restored to its original configuration. Any qualified gunsmith, who restores old guns can do it. It may have broken from dry-firing the gun without the flint, when the top jaw hit the frizzen, or, like you say, from repeated use. Who knows...
Dmitry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd October 2013, 05:18 AM   #4
Miqueleter
Member
 
Miqueleter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Southern California
Posts: 39
Default

Dmitry and James,

Perhaps item number FC159 from https://www.blackleyandson.com/ would be a good start at replacing that top jaw. FC159 sure looks like the broken one and measures 1.437". Just sayin'
Miqueleter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th October 2013, 10:43 AM   #5
Marcus den toom
Member
 
Marcus den toom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 541
Default

The page of der Neue stockel, (i don't own any rights on these pics)



Marcus den toom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2013, 11:10 PM   #6
JamesKelly
Member
 
JamesKelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Michigan, U.S.A.
Posts: 108
Default

Thank you, Marcus!
JamesKelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2013, 03:50 PM   #7
Fernando K
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 672
Default

Hello:

A little late. The traditional method in miquelete, is that the upper jaw has an appendix, which is introduced into the body of the cat's foot or "trigger". Just at the gun D. But it is up to the forum, American Powder Horn, follow this method. Here should be examined whether the post is on the drill.

This method is very old, and it was still in the key (lock) to the "lace". See page 180/182 of LAVIN

Sorry for the translator

Affectionately. Fernando K
Fernando K is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.