![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]() Quote:
Spunjer, I agree at first glance the scabbard appears like the WW2 era ones, and it may be. There is no doubt this scabbard was made for this blade. The quality of this scabbard is not typical of WW2 era pieces which we tend to find broken and cracked quite often as they were made from a softer more easy to carve wood. The front panel of this scabbard is made from a hardwood with clearly flashing grains, really something I would more expect to see on an Indonesian keris. I am not so confident about putting a date on it, but clearly it was attempt to create and upgraded, even exotic, look....especially compared to what we see in typical Moro barong scabbards and the wood that is used for some of them, most especially the later ones. Last edited by CharlesS; 2nd October 2013 at 02:13 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,018
|
![]()
Really nice!
I like the way they used a black horn spacer with the ivory. The accoutrements adds flair to the scabbard. It amazes me how delicate looking the carvings are on both pieces and how they stayed intact thru time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
To be fair, as mentioned in the opener, there was some restoration to the wood on the first one, and some of that involved the carved top(right top edge).
The second one is untouched and I especially love the carving on that one, though both are intricate. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|