![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
No worries James. We all have items in our collections that were lessons. Actually, yours is better than many first keris. It's incomplete and a bit of a mishmash, but at least the metal work shows some quality. I look forward to seeing what comes to you from Singapore.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Michigan, U.S.A.
Posts: 108
|
![]()
Back to former workplace Oct 10, got to use an X-ray fluoroscope, one that seems good on non-ferrous, not so sure about steel.
The little/oversize "brass" hilt ring analysis is: 67.6% copper; 20.84% zinc; 4.51% silicon; 3.25% tin; 2.33% lead; 1.21%iron and 0.18% phosphorus. Perhaps a copper-alloy metallurgist can make something of this. If he studies copper alloys of Indonesia. The silicon surprises me, guess it would make the alloy fairly hard. Lead is usually added to make castings more sound, iron & phosphorus just residual impurities. The blade is of course a mix of at least two different steel grades, some part of it is about 1% nickel, 0.13% phosphorus. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
I'm wondering if the high copper content is supposed to differ the appearance of the finished product from brass ; perhaps a little closer to swaasa when viewed .
![]() James, can we see more pictures of the keris hilt ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,270
|
![]()
Basically what you have here is brass. The rest are added for various reasons, perhaps some being impurities.
The main percentage of mix (roughly 88%) is copper and zinc = brass. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|