|
|
|
22nd April 2013, 11:50 PM
|
#1 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,270
|
I have seen these with leeches - what is the significance behind the usage of leeches?
|
|
|
|
23rd April 2013, 04:54 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,453
|
Quote:
Sometimes we can see one ore more faces in a handle, of which the "leeches" representatives the limbs. (Though the limbs more often are represented with "bow's"). Between these "clear" figures the carver used other motifs to "fill the gaps" with no specific representation. I have the feeling most of the leeches have no significant meaning in general. Often the representation of the figures, mouth's, eyes, ears, limbs (etc.) are carved so stylistical, that's hard to find out what representatives what (in between other "no representative filled out gaps carvings"), an also these stylistical limbs could be looking like "leeches". In Charles handle I can't tell what the "leeches" representatives unfortunately because of it's stylistic representation. Maurice Last edited by Maurice; 23rd April 2013 at 05:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
23rd April 2013, 07:33 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,453
|
Text about the "leeches" used by the Bahau tribes by Anton Willem Nieuwenhuis, found "in Central Borneo II" page 364.
A motif, to fill up the empty gaps, is used largly in their swordhandles and - scabbards by the Bahaus, who call these "leeches". These leeches are perfect for the dajak to use filling these empty gaps, without harming the resemblence with the nature too much... Maurice |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
