|
|
|
1st March 2013, 10:09 PM
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
Hello Maurice,
Quote:
Note that this is small (blade 11.5 inches = 29 cm) - should handle more like a knife rather than a sword. Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
1st March 2013, 11:04 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,453
|
Quote:
Haha missed that! Would be a very tiny amanremu blade than.. Regards, Maurice |
|
|
|
|
|
3rd March 2013, 09:52 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,164
|
Thank you all for comment!
 I am also haven't seen that it is so small! 
|
|
|
|
|
4th March 2013, 12:27 AM
|
#4 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
Ok I just handled this piece this weekend here at the Louisville show. IT is a nice piece but small - more of a dagger size, not a sword.
Almost bought it, but bought other stuff at the show......... |
|
|
|
|
4th March 2013, 09:12 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
I have my doubts: there are no other hilts like this found in any reference works; the blade is much smaller than usual; it was originally sold by a Sumatran dealer who seems to "renovate" old blades now and then.
Michael |
|
|
|
|
4th March 2013, 11:42 PM
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,228
|
[QUOTE=VVV it was originally sold by a Sumatran dealer who seems to "renovate" old blades now and then.
[/QUOTE] Yes, my great fear. When offered from a suspicious seller, your are warned. But when it shows up in a different setting, your are less careful and hope to have found a rare variation....   
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
