![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 163
|
![]()
More
Ric |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 163
|
![]()
More
Ric |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 163
|
![]()
Yet more
Ric |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 163
|
![]()
double posting Sorry
Ric |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
Hello friends,
Personally and in order to facilitate further reference I would recommend that we open a separate post for each main type of pamor so that everyone could include his specimens at any time. And as advised by Alan I would further propose that we standardize the pictures as follows: full blade viewed from both sides, sor-soran viewed fom both sides, and ganja base viewed from the peksi tip. ![]() Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin
Posts: 163
|
![]()
Jean,
Sounds good. These images were taken from other threads so you get what they posted. Ric |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,228
|
![]() Quote:
Certainly images of blades in their sheaths, while perhaps nice to look at, deal with dress and not pamor so i would recommend that we refrain from posting such images. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,347
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,047
|
![]()
My vote would be for a single thread dealing with only pamor.
As David has said, if we begin to categorise and split into types, we then have the difficulty of identifying the pamor in order to categorise it, and what would be the basis for the categorisation? The whole thing would be too difficult. Nope, I really do think that we dump everything into one basket, and if the necessity should arise whereby we need to examine a particular pamor more closely, we can lift that pamor and begin a thread for its examination. I see Ric's pamor thread as something like an overarching reference, that can then generate further threads. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|