|
|
|
22nd January 2013, 06:13 PM
|
#1 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,458
|
Thanks weapons.
I never mind being wrong as long as I can learn from the matter in discussion and corrected data. Since this is a most esoteric topic it is a welcome addition to our threads here. The main thing is that we all learn when information is shared. |
|
|
|
22nd January 2013, 08:45 PM
|
#2 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Well Jim, in a way, stirrups for Rural Ranch Cowboys, only in the French version: Gardiens de taureaux de la Camargue
 . |
|
|
|
|
23rd January 2013, 05:46 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 462
|
Quote:
These Stirrups are different from the model shown I will attach a picture in the day |
|
|
|
|
|
23rd January 2013, 12:11 PM
|
#4 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
I was not referring to a specific model/s, but to the general typology !
|
|
|
|
|
23rd January 2013, 09:33 PM
|
#5 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,458
|
Nicely said Fernando! Your patience is amazing, and it is indeed helpful to remember that in discussions examples and analogies are often included which pertain to a type or form associated, and not necessarily 'exact' in comparison to those being shown. This convention perhaps escapes the perspective of some. This sometimes comes into play with items which have certain differences, and these are often termed 'variants'.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
