Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 3rd September 2012, 06:34 AM   #1
Nathaniel
Member
 
Nathaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
Thumbs up

Nice dha by the way Fernado! I like the herring bone weave on the handle and the engraving on the handle is nicely done. Thanks for sharing!
Nathaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 01:13 PM   #2
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathaniel
Nice dha by the way Fernado! I like the herring bone weave on the handle and the engraving on the handle is nicely done. Thanks for sharing!
Thanks Nathaniel; for your words and for the Kachin girls link .
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 01:16 PM   #3
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Say guys:
Any chance this sword is earlier than 20th century ?
... The silver patination is influencing me to think about (even if late) 19th century .
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 02:44 PM   #4
Royston
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Poole England
Posts: 443
Default Pommel

Hello Fernando

This is the end of the one I recently posted. As you can see, it is almost identical to yours except that mine has been plugged.

I am not convinced that it is bamboo as the the wall thickness is much greater than I would expect.

Regards
Roy
Attached Images
  
Royston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 03:17 PM   #5
Andrew
Member
 
Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
Default

Royston, I am even more certain that your's is bamboo--that "cell-like" structure viewing it from the distal end is a dead-giveaway. Some bamboo is quite thick...
Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 03:22 PM   #6
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
Default

There are types of bamboo that do not have a hollow core, so I would agree with Andrew .
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 03:22 PM   #7
Sajen
Member
 
Sajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany, Dortmund
Posts: 9,164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Royston
I am not convinced that it is bamboo as the the wall thickness is much greater than I would expect.

Regards
Roy

Hello Roy,

have a look here: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=4093

Best regards,

Detlef
Sajen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 03:38 PM   #8
Ferguson
Member
 
Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kernersville, NC, USA
Posts: 793
Default

I have never seen thick walled bamboo like that. But I started Googling thick walled bamboo and found that it is common. Certain varieties like Bambusa burmanica (found in Thailand and Burma) have very thick walls. It's amazing how our interest in ethnographic weapons leads us into other areas!

Steve
Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 04:40 PM   #9
Royston
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Poole England
Posts: 443
Default

OK Gents

I stand corrected on the wall thicknesses of bamboo. I'm too used to seeing the thin-walled types that we get here in the UK.

Detlef, your link appears to be about coconut, not bamboo. ( Nice pictures though )

Regards
Roy
Royston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 05:17 PM   #10
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Thumbs up Inevitable contamination

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferguson
... It's amazing how our interest in ethnographic weapons leads us into other areas!...
Absolutely.
I often tell people that a large (largest?) part of my present (insignificant) knowledge is due to arms collecting side efects.
... The launching base being this forum .
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 03:21 PM   #11
Andrew
Member
 
Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fernando
Say guys:
Any chance this sword is earlier than 20th century ?
... The silver patination is influencing me to think about (even if late) 19th century .
Possibly. My estimate was just that. The distinction of late 19th vs. early 20th c. is largely one without a real difference.

BTW, silver patination can be a difficult thing to base age estimates on--some silver alloys can develop dark, heavy patination very quickly...

Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 05:32 PM   #12
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew
...The distinction of late 19th vs. early 20th c. is largely one without a real difference...
In a mere counting way yes, you're right; but in certain other aspects ... means a lot .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew
... BTW, silver patination can be a difficult thing to base age estimates on--some silver alloys can develop dark, heavy patination very quickly...
Sure thing; duly noted


.

Last edited by fernando; 4th September 2012 at 12:03 PM.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 06:04 PM   #13
lordkoos
Member
 
lordkoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 22
Default

The woven part of the handle would be rattan, ie shredded palm leaf, some varieties produce very strong fibers.
lordkoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 10:41 PM   #14
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lordkoos
The woven part of the handle would be rattan, ie shredded palm leaf, some varieties produce very strong fibers.
Well.........um..........actually rattan comes from a jungle vine plant that is stripped into long strands.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2012, 03:00 PM   #15
Andrew
Member
 
Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lordkoos
The woven part of the handle would be rattan, ie shredded palm leaf, some varieties produce very strong fibers.
Not likely on this particular weapon. Textile weaving is a well-established art form in the region and among the ethnic groups found there.
Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th September 2012, 06:45 PM   #16
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Do these help ?


.
Attached Images
  
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 07:29 PM   #17
aiontay
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
Default

Nathaniel,

I've spent plenty of time with Kachin people in Thailand (the exile community in Chiang Mai) among the Kachins in the Northern Shan State, and the Kachin here in Oklahoma. Yeah, Oklahoma. There is a Kachin woman (Maru) from Kutkai whose aunt and uncle worked for me on a crop substitution project who now lives about 3 miles from my parents' house in Tulsa, OK. My thesis is on the Kachins. All this to say that Jinghpaw does not necessarily equal Kachin. In fact, the majority of the ten Kachin families in Tulsa are not Jinghpaw. Around Kutkai there were plenty of Maru, Lashi, and Atsi. And then there are those Lisu, who sometimes are and sometimes aren't Kachin.
aiontay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2012, 09:01 PM   #18
Nathaniel
Member
 
Nathaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aiontay
Nathaniel,

I've spent plenty of time with Kachin people in Thailand (the exile community in Chiang Mai) among the Kachins in the Northern Shan State, and the Kachin here in Oklahoma. Yeah, Oklahoma. There is a Kachin woman (Maru) from Kutkai whose aunt and uncle worked for me on a crop substitution project who now lives about 3 miles from my parents' house in Tulsa, OK. My thesis is on the Kachins. All this to say that Jinghpaw does not necessarily equal Kachin. In fact, the majority of the ten Kachin families in Tulsa are not Jinghpaw. Around Kutkai there were plenty of Maru, Lashi, and Atsi. And then there are those Lisu, who sometimes are and sometimes aren't Kachin.
Thanks Ainotay for the background. Still all confusing to me...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kachin_people
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jingpo_...Categorization
I read different books that mention the different classification systems and can't keep things straight. I think I need to make a flow chart so I can keep the different tribal groups straight and the different names for the same group...ie Thai name for a certain group and the Burmese name, Chinese, Lao, etc for the same group.
Nathaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.