![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
Ah, because that's not what you said is it? But even the head doesn't look 18thC to me. Which part of the head? The whole head including the brass elephant of the type well known on the later 19thC pieces and even early 20th wall hangers? Oh well, I guess the "acknowleged experts and professionals in the field" can't be argued with ![]() Who was it BTW? I sure changed my mind about Lion headed chrome plated Indian Kukri after Manchester Museum (who have a nice selection of fine Kukri) identified this 'Rare Ghurka sword': http://insidethem60.journallocal.co....hester-museum/ In case the picture is too small, here's the larger version: Last edited by Atlantia; 2nd September 2012 at 04:15 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,340
|
![]()
Their faces are priceless xD Oh how much I wish to tell them that its a touristy item made in some basement... lol
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Sharp end
Posts: 2,928
|
![]() Quote:
I'm guessing that this 'rare' Kukri won't make it to the public display that they mentioned. In some ways museums are more likely to misidentify than collectors. Museums sometimes have the problem that their experience seems limited to genuine items and when they see fakes or reproductions they try to fit them into their sphere of knowledge. Often it's the collectors who have more 'experience' of the later or reproduced items than the so-called experts. Then of course there is 'expert syndrome' as well. lol |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|