![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
I agree that quite a bit of craftmanship and effort went into making this piece.
However, it just doesn't vibes with me: neither as a traditional Moro piece nor as Malay work. Apart from the weird gandik area, the flow of lines of the blade is as strange as the inlay and the engraved motif at the end of the fullers; the hilt seems to copy a Sulu junggayan but both the pommel as well as the stepped grip area seems kinda off to me; peened over tang or just holding the pommel onto the grip (another unconventional approach)? If I had to bet, I'd lay my 2 cents on it being a fairly recent reproduction, possibly by those busy Madurese artisans? Any signs of modern glue at the pommel/grip attachment or for setting the blade? Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
BTW, where did this sword come from?
(Not locally from Sao Vicente, I guess.) Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,378
|
Quote:
I think it's maybe post 1950's Kembang Kacang is all wrong, way too diminuitive .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,362
|
Yes although I stand by what I said, there are more than those things I mentioned that are strange about this.
Kai you have a point - it may have been made recently - hadn't thought of that. Would make more sense. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sao Vicente
Posts: 28
|
Hi Kai,
It come from Nederland. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
Quote:
Regards, Kai |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,464
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sao Vicente
Posts: 28
|
The seller in Rotterdam, told me that it was a Malay Kris, but I doubt he knows more than me.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|