![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 54
|
![]()
Need your opinion to identify this blade. I have attached naga blade photos.
Blade and gonjo length are respectively 43 cm and 11 cm, I myself reckon that this blade is a Javanese blade, but if we see the blade length which is quite big for javanese typical blades, I might classify it as Balinese blade, the blade is on Balinese dress as well. There is also an opinion that the blade could come from most eastern part of east Java. I look forward your opinion..Thanking you in advance. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
Yes, almost 17 inches is indeed a long Javanese blade, but this does not look like Balinese work to me.
![]() One can find many Javanese blades in Bali dress, so i wouldn't necessarily take that into consideration. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 54
|
![]()
Hi David, thank you for the comment. I totally agree with you, many Javanese blades in Bali dress however the dress particularly original dress, can will give great clue to identify blade origin..Frankly, I am not sure its wrongko in Bali dress, here I attached the wrongko pic probably you can tell me where is the wrongko from whether Bali or Java..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]()
This wrongko does not look balinese from the bulky proportions and the lack of carving details on the crosspiece, and the slim stem (rather from East Java?).
I personally wonder whether the blade is really old or artificially aged, the pamor fully covering the naga head does not look natural for instance but I may be wrong.... ![]() Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I think you are right to suspect, though, that this dress is not Balinese. It might just be the angle that you photographed it, but wrongko does not look to be the right shape and proportion for Balinese sheaths of this type, so maybe E. Java is it's origins after all. Also it's wearing a Javanese mendak. ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 328
|
![]()
IMHO the only part which COULD be considered Balinese is the hilt. I think that the bade is definitely non-Balinese.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
The dress also appears quite new judging from the pictures .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|