![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 157
|
![]()
I forgot to mention that the muzzle decoration on both Jaipur marked examples is rather similar. Again I have no idea whether this is important or coincidence. Perhaps if others have similarly stamped examples we might get some clues?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 1,065
|
![]()
I chris
I Just bought one last week who is around 190 cm ,you could see the pics in my new thread.( very similar than your's) Kind Regards Cerjak |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 157
|
![]()
Hi Cerjak - congratulations on that toradar
![]() The muzzle decoration is indeed very similar to mine and the other pictured in the post. Can't be just coincidence. Looks like you are lucky and also have a match holder on yours too! I'm not sure what it is but these are appealing somehow - not pretty but extremely functional. The numbers on the butt are very different from mine, so I guess this is another rack numbering or something. You don't seem to have Jaipur armoury marks on the barrel either - so we are at least getting some variety. Since the last post I have found another mother of pearl decorated gun with JPR stamps, a battlement gun with, and another without JPR stamps - unfortunately all three of these also eluded me ![]() I am still assuming/hoping somebody must know about these Jaipur numbers - when and why they were applied? Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 932
|
![]()
Received in my e-mail:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|