![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Olomouc
Posts: 1,719
|
![]()
Thank you for the images Swordfish, in particular for the series of the hand and a half with Cross Fourchee. I am always interested to see swords marked in this manner, since I own a takouba blade marked in the same way rehilted of course.
It is always then fascinating for me to learn about the stockpiling of European arms of this period among the Ottomans. Thanks again for a good read! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
Interesting, thank you!
after the conquest of Egypt in 1517 the ottomans included many Alexandria swords and took them to Constantinople. If the swords were Already marked or inscribed, and therefor were already under Islam sacred objects, they were not desecrated by an additional mark, a Tamga. This explains why the combination on one and the same sword of a Tamga and arsenal inscription "not...... well hardly" appears. sword 5 has indeed a very interesting blade geometry. wherein the concave ensures that a strong and very sharp cutting edge arrises. The light protective clothing, probably forced by nature, by the heat in these areas, explained the popularity of several types of European cutting swords there in the 14th and 15 century. This sword could be a precursor of the highly cq. most efficient 2 hand-cutting sword, with a blade very wide at the cross, strong tapering and with a light centered mid rib,...........The oakeshott Type XVIIIC. If this theory is true, the sword may be dated in the third quarter of the 14th century. for an example of XVIIIC please see your light mail thread. best, Last edited by cornelistromp; 2nd April 2012 at 11:28 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Romania
Posts: 204
|
![]()
Very interesting.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 129
|
![]()
Hi,
I know the Alexandria group of swords, but these are not really captured from the Europeans. These swords are often treated in other publications, therefore I have not mentioned them here. It is surely right, that the majority of swords with Alexandria inscription do not bear the Tamga, but some do exist. A friend of mine has such a one in his collection. The sword can be dated stylistically c. 1430, the cross has already a simple finger-ring. Unfortunately I don`t know if the inscription is dated. Swords like fig.5 were surely in use during the second half of the 14th century, as well as during the first quarter of the 15th century, therefore I have dated it roughly c.1400. Sword fig.5 has a flat and flexible cutting blade with a fuller running down nearly all the length, therefore it can not be of type XVIIIc. The swords of this type have stiff blades of diamond section, even the ones with a fuller. If I have to categorise the blade, I would put it into type XIIa. Best |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,060
|
![]()
Hi,
yes, sword nr 5 is indeed Oakeshott Type XIIA, I described it as a precursor/forerunner of the type XVIIIC (actually not as a type XVIIIC.) Because it has a blade with a kind of wedge towards the cutting edge, caused by the concave, this really makes it like type XVIIIC a pure cutting sword. The mid rib of the type XVIIIC causes a similar kind of wedge towards the cutting edge. When the geometry and balance of this XIIa sword are improved during the time it can evolve into a cutting sword like type XVIIIC. The group XIIa was created by oakeshott some time after his classification , I believe with the publication of ROMS, before these 2 hand swords with tapering blades and longer fullers were (incorrectly) placed in XIIIa. Original swords with arsenal inscription and Tamga actually are not known, I am very curious about each example which has both. about the type of sword # 1 is also much Published, for example by DG Alexander-European Swords in the collection of Istanbul partII. Swords captured directly by the ottomans or recieved as Sultan gifts. Sword #1 is placed in group XVII ,according to DG Alexander it is not possible to know when these swords fell in hands of the ottomans, only for the simple fact that during the 2nd half of the 15th century many battles have been fought. An almost identical sword as nr 1 is in Topkapi Museum Istanbul under # A14793 best, Last edited by cornelistromp; 3rd April 2012 at 03:14 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 129
|
![]()
Schiavona in the Military Museum Istanbul, grip replaced.
Best |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 129
|
![]()
Fig. 6
This photograph, taken in 1889 by Abdullah Freres, shows another panoply of captured arms. The two swords dating c. 1400 are of European origin, captured by the Ottomans during their conquest of Alexandria in 1517. They bear the Arsenal inscription from Alexandria. The two halberds of the early 16th century are of German origin. The left one has distinctive features: The spike bears a small round mark, the blade has a small nick on the lower side (hardly visible on the low resolution scan), and the side straps are broken off at the fourth hole. Fig. 7 A German halberd of exact the same shape as the one on the panoply. This halberd is not only a halberd of the same shape and workshop, it is the one depicted on the panoply! It has exactly the features as the one on the panoply: The same mark, the nick on the blade, and the later added lower parts of the side straps are welded on at the fourth hole. It was sold some times ago at auction. Best Last edited by Swordfish; 3rd June 2012 at 07:03 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|